“The Linguistic Consequences of Being a Lame” … in Medieval England
To the Memory of William Labov
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2025-47.1.12Keywords:
standardness, social networks, lames, competence, performance, double-voicingAbstract
The study of ties and membership in social networks and the engagement of speakers in joint enterprises has revealed that common practices can be sociolinguistically indexical and consciously used in constructing and projecting social identity. In fact, the nuclear or peripheral position of members in peer-group activity has been shown to strongly condition their relative sociolinguistic behaviour. The aim of this article is the exploration of individuals’ membership status through their linguistic production in late medieval England, when the conception of a national linguistic variety of English was emerging. An analysis of was- and were-levelling processes in the past tense conjugation of be is carried out on the collection of private correspondence of the Paston family, written during the fifteenth century (1425-1503) by different generations of this gentry dynasty from Norfolk. The study of the sociolinguistic behavioural patterns for this variable in the letters provides us with a new in-group dimension for core members and “lames” on the basis of their shared verbal practices and networks, employed to preserve the values of the group and its identity within the community. In the context of loose-knit social networks with weak ties, some linguistic choices may tend to transmit adherence to a focused variety and become a trend for imitation. However, isolated members may perfectly happily persist in adhering to vernacular practices, and as such occupy a less crucial position in terms of the diffusion of linguistic innovations within the community.
Downloads
References
Auer, Anita. 2018. “Urban Literacies and Processes of Supralocalisation: A Historical Sociolinguistic Perspective.” In Braber and Jansen 2018, 13-34.
—, Daniel Schreier and Richard J. Watts, eds. 2015. Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy and John Bellamy, eds. 2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barber, Richard, ed. 1993. The Pastons. A Family in the Wars of the Roses. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
Bell, Allan. 1984. “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society 13: 145-204.
Benskin, Michael. 2004. “Chancery Standard.” In Kay, Hough and Wotherspoon 2004, 1-40.
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421-1503). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
—, 2012. “The Uniformitarian Principle and the Risk of Anachronisms in Language and Social History.” In Hernández-Campoy and Conde-Silvestre 2012, 80-98.
—, 2015. “Linguistic Fingerprints of Authors and Scribes.” In Auer, Schreier and Watts 2015, 114-132.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo et al., eds. 2000. Generative Theory and Corpus Studies. A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Braber, Natalie and Sandra Jansen, eds. 2018. Sociolinguistics in England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Britain, David. 2002. “Diffusion, Levelling, Simplification and Reallocation in Past Tense BE in the English Fens”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1): 16-43.
Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
—, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes, eds. 2002. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Cutillas-Espinosa, Juan Antonio and Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel. 2021. “Historical Sociolinguistics and Authorship Elucidation in Medieval Private Written Correspondence: Theoretical Implications for Forensic Linguistics”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 121(2): 357-394.
Davis, Norman O. ed. 1971. Paston Letters and Papers of the Fifteenth Century (2 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon.
—, ed. 1983. The Paston Letters: A Selection in Modern Spelling. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Daybell, James, ed. 2001. Early Modern Women’s Letter Writing, 1470-1700. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
De Haas, Nynke and Ans van Kemenade. 2015. “The Origin of the Northern Subject Rule: Subject Positions and Verbal Morphosyntax in Older English.” English Language and Linguistics 19(1): 49-81. doi:10.1017/S1360674314000306.
Deumert, Ana. 2003. Language Standardization and Language Change. The Dynamics of Cape Dutch. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
—, and Wim Vandenbussche, eds. 2003. Germanic Standardizations. Past to Present. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dittmar, Norbert and Peter Schlobinski, eds. 1988. The Sociolinguistics of Urban Vernaculars: Case Studies and their Evaluation. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Dodd, Gwilym. 2011a. “The Spread of English in the Records of Central Government, 1400-30”. In Salter and Wicker 2011, 225-266.
—, 2011b. “The Rise of English, the Decline of French: Supplications to the English Crown, c. 1420-50.” Speculum 86(1): 117-150.
—, 2012. “Trilingualism in the Medieval English Bureaucracy: the Use - and Disuse - of Languages in the Fifteenth Century Privy Seal Office.” Journal of British Studies 51(2): 253-283.
Dossena, Marina and Roger Lass. eds. 2004. Methods and Data in English Historical Dialectology. Bern: Peter Lang.
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.
—, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. “Think Practically and Look Locally. Language and Gender as Community-Based Practices.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21: 461-490.
Fagyal, Zsuzsanna, Swarup, Samarth, Escobar, Anna Maria, Gasser, Les, and Lakkaraju, Kiran. 2010. “Centers, Peripheries, and Popularity: The Emergence of Norms in Simulated Networks of Linguistic Influence.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2), 81-90.
Hamilton, Anne Marie. 2001. “Urban and Rural Forms of Language.” In Mesthrie 2001, 418-419.
Harsh, Wayne. 1968. The Subjunctive in English. Birmingham, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel. 2008. “Overt and Covert Prestige in Late Middle English: A Case Study in East Anglia”. Folia Lingüística Historica 29: 1-26.
—. 2012. “Gender, Polarity and Mood in Late Medieval England: Evidence from The Paston Family”. In Vázquez 2012, 293-310.
—. 2013. “Ladylikeness and Sociolinguistic Submission in Late Medieval English Society: Gender-Based Use of Negation in John Paston I and Margaret Paston”. Atlantis 35(1): 11-34.
—. 2016. Sociolinguistic styles. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
—, and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre. 1999. “The Social Diffusion of Linguistic Innovations in 15th century England: Chancery Spellings in Private Correspondence”. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 8: 251–274.
—, and Natalie Schilling. 2012. “The Application of the Quantitative Paradigm to Historical Sociolinguistics: Problems with the Generalizability Principle”. In Hernández-Campoy and Conde-Silvestre 2012, 63-79.
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre, eds. 2012. The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Horrox, Rosemary and W. Mark Ormrod, eds. 2006. A Social History of England, 1200-1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James Francis. 1986. Semantics of the English subjunctive. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Johnstone, Barbara and Scott F. Kiesling. 2008. “Indexicality and Experience: Variation and Identity in Pittsburgh.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1): 5-33.
Kay, Christian J., Carole A. Hough and Irené Wotherspoon, eds. 2004, New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics: Selected Papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow 21-26 August 2002. Volume III: Lexis and Transmission. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins,
Kerswill, Paul. 2002. Koineization and Accommodation. In Chambers, Trudgill and Schilling-Estes 2002, 669-702.
Kitson, Peter. 2004. “On Margins of Error in Placing Old English Literary Dialects.” In Dossena and Lass 2004, 219-239.
Klemola, Juhani. 2000. “The origins of the Northern Subject Rule: a case of early contact.” In Tristram 2000, 329-346.
Labov, William. 1973. “The Linguistic Consequence of Being a Lame.” Language in Society 2: 81-115.
—, 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change II: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
—, 2006 [1966]. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (second edition).
Machan, Tim William and Charles T. Scott, eds. 1992. English in its Social Contexts. Essays in Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mesthrie, Rajend, ed. 2001. Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics. New York: Elsevier.
Miller, Catherine and Jacopo Falchetta. 2021. “Standardization and New Urban Vernaculars.” In Ayres-Bennett and Bellamy 2021, 713-740.
Milroy, James and Lesley Milroy. 1985. “Linguistic Change, Social Network and Speaker Innovation.” Journal of Linguistics 21: 339-384.
Milroy, Lesley. 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
Moore, Colette. 2019. “Communities of Practice and Incipient Standardization in Middle English Written Culture.” English Studies 100(2): 117-132.
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2000. “Processes of Supralocalisation and the Rise of Standard English in the Early Modern Period.” In Bermúdez-Otero, Denison, Hogg and McCully 2000, 329-371.
—, 2003. “English.” In Deumert and Vandenbussche, 127-156.
—, 2003. “English.” In Deumert and Vandenbussche 2003, 127-156.
—, and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, eds. 1996. Sociolinguistics and Language History. Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
—, and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, eds. 2007. Letter Writing. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nobels, Judith. and Marijke van der Wal. 2009. “Tackling the Writer-Sender Problem: The New Developed Leiden Identification Procedure (LIP).” Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics [Accessed online on April 12, 2025] (http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl/Nobels-Wal.html).
Nurmi, Arja, Minna Nevala and Minna Palander-Collin, eds. 2009. The Language of Daily Life in England (1400-1800). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Palander-Collin, Minna, Minna Nevala and Arja Nurmi. 2009. “The Language of Daily Life in the History of English. Studying how Macro meets Micro.” In Nurmi, Nevala and Palander-Collin 2009, 1-23.
Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity Among Adolescents. London: Longman.
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1996. “Historical Sociolinguistics.” In Nevalainen and Raumolin-Brunberg 1996, 11-37.
Salter, Elizabeth and Helen Wicker. eds. 2011. Vernacularity in England and Wales, c. 1300-1550. Utretch: Brepols.
Schaefer, Ursula. 2006. “The Beginning of Standardization: The Communicative Space in Fourteenth-Century England.” In Schaefer 2006, 3-24.
Schaefer, Ursula. ed. 2006. The Beginnings of Standardization: Language and Culture in Fourteenth-Century England. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Schneider, Edgar W. 2002. “Investigating Variation and Change in Written Documents.” In Chambers, Trudgill and Schilling-Estes 2002, 67-96.
Schreier, Daniel and Marianne Hundt, eds. 2013. English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Jeremy J. 1992. “The Use of English. Language Contact, Dialect Variation, and Written Standardization during the Middle English period.” In Machan and Scott 1992, 47-68.
Stenroos, Merja 2020. “The ‘Vernacularisation’ and ‘Standardisation’ of Local Administrative Writing in Late and Post-Medieval England.” In Wright 2020c, 39-85.
Tannen, Deborah. 2005. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tristram, Hildegard L.C., ed. 2000. Celtic Englishes II. Heidelberg: Winter.
Trudgill, Peter. 1983a. On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.
—, 1983b. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
—, 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
—, 2004. New-Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
van der Wal, Marijke and Gijsbert Rutten, eds. 2013. Touching the Past: Studies in the Historical Sociolinguistics of Ego-Documents. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vázquez, Nila. ed. 2012. Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Wood, Johanna L. 2007. “Text in Context: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach to Margaret Paston.” In Nevalainen and Tanskanen 2007, 47-71.
Wright, Laura. ed. 2000a. The Development of Standard English 1300-1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—, 2000b. “Introduction.” In Wright 2000a, 1-8.
—, 2013. “The Contact Origins of Standard English.” In Schreier and Hundt 2013, 58-74.
—, ed. 2020a. The Multilingual Origins of Standard English. Berlin and Boston, MA: Mouton de Gruyter.
—, 2020b. Introduction. In Wright 2020a, 3-15.
—, 2020c. “A Critical Look at Previous Accounts of the Standardisation of English.” In Wright 2020a, 17-38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Juan M. Hernández-Campoy, Tamara García-Vidal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
