Race Relations in Black and White: Visual Impairment as a Racialized and Gendered Metaphor in Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man and Herman Melville’s “Benito Cereno”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2017-39.2.02Abstract
While scholarship has increasingly acknowledged Ralph Ellison’s indebtedness to Herman Melville, whose novella “Benito Cereno” (1855) was used as an epigraph to Invisible Man (1952), fewer scholars have discussed their common literary foci on blindness as a racial and gendered visual metaphor. Borrowing from the latest scholarship on whiteness and/as racial dominance, this article revisits “Benito Cereno” to show how Captain Delano’s lack of belief in the possibility of a slave insurrection throughout the novella is itself an effect of racism, stemming mostly from the taken-for-granted-ness of white superiority, which Melville shows as distorting the whites’ perceptions of blacks. In so doing, I will also explore Ellison’s reworking of Melville’s racial imagery in Invisible Man, which seems to extend the blindness metaphor to both black and white characters, re-presenting cross-racial blindness as reciprocal rather than unidirectional. As part of this argument, the article posits the inseparability of gender and race, suggesting that Ellison’s depiction of white racism may be traced back to the (antebellum) definition of American manhood as free and nonenslaved, which Melville’s novella both illustrates and undermines. I thus conclude that Ellison’s and Melville’s works skilfully anatomize, and critique, the discourses on whiteness and/as masculinity of their respective historical moments, highlighting their interdependence, but also their internal contradictions, which the black characters end up using to their own advantage.
Keywords: Herman Melville; Ralph Ellison; “Benito Cereno”; Invisible Man; literary influence; black-white relations
Downloads
References
Aanerud, Rebecca. 1997. “Fictions of Whiteness: Speaking the Names of Whiteness in US Literature.” In Displacing Whiteness: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism, edited by Ruth Frankenberg, 35-59. Durham and London: Duke UP.
Bederman, Gail. 1996. Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880-1917. Chicago: Chicago UP.
Busby, Mark. 1991. Ralph Ellison. New York: Twayne.
Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic. 1997. “Images of the Outsider in American Law and Culture.” In Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, eds., 170-178.
Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, eds. 1997. Critical White Studies: Looking Behind the Mirror. Philadelphia: Temple UP.
Du Bois, W.E.B. (1903) 2005. The Souls of Black Folk, edited by Candace Ward. New York: Pocket Books.
Dyer, Richard. 2004. Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society. New York: Routledge.
Ellison, Ralph. (1952) 1995a. “Introduction.” In Invisible Man, vii-xxiii. New York: Vintage.
—. (1952) 1995b. Invisible Man. New York: Vintage.
—. (1953) 2003a. “Twentieth-Century Fiction and the Black Mask of Humanity.” In The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison, edited by John F. Callahan, 81-99. New York: The Modern Library.
—. (1964) 2003b. “Some Questions and Some Answers.” In The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison, edited by John F. Callahan, 292-301. New York: The Modern Library.
Frankenberg, Ruth. 1997. “Introduction: Local Whitenesses, Localizing Whiteness.” In Displacing Whiteness: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism, edited by Ruth Frankenberg, 1-33. London and Durham, NC: Duke UP.
Fredrickson, George. 1997. “White Images of Black Slaves (Is What We See in Others Sometimes a Reflection of What We Find in Ourselves?).” In Delgado, Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, eds., 38-45.
Gray, Valerie Bonita. 1978. Invisible Man’s Literary Heritage: Benito Cereno and Moby Dick. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Hardin, Michael. 2004. “Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man: Invisibility, Race, and Homoeroticism from Frederick Douglass to E. Lynn Harris.” Southern Literary Journal 37 (1): 96-120.
Hogeland, Lisa Maria. 1996. “Invisible Man and Invisible Women: The Sex/Race Analogy of the 1970s.” Women’s History Review 5 (1): 31-53.
hooks, bell. 1997. “Representing Whiteness in the Black Imagination.” In Displacing Whiteness: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism, edited by Ruth Frankenberg, 165-179. London and Durham, NC: Duke UP.
Hsu, Hsuan. 2003. “Regarding Mimicry: Race and Visual Ethics in Invisible Man.” Arizona Quarterly 59 (2): 107-140.
Jay, Gregory. 2008. “Douglass, Melville, and the Lynching of Billy Budd.” In Frederick Douglass and Herman Melville: Essays in Relation, edited by Robert S. Levine and Samuel Otter, 369-395. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina P.
Keresztesi, Rita. 2005. Strangers at Home: American Ethnic Modernism Between the World Wars. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P.
Kim, Daniel Y. 2005. Writing Manhood in Black and Yellow. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.
Lamm, Kimberly. 2003. “Visuality and Black Masculinity in Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man and Romare Bearden’s Photomontages.” Callaloo 26 (3): 813-835.
Leak, Jeffrey B. 2005. Racial Myths and Masculinity in African American Literature. Knoxville: University of Tennessee P.
Lott, Eric. 1995. Love and Theft: Blackface Minstrelsy and the American Working Class. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Mahoney, Martha R. 1997. “Racial Construction and Women as Differentiated Actors.” In Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, eds., 305-309.
McIntosh, Peggy. (1988) 1997. “White Privilege and Male Privilege: A Personal Account of Coming to see Correspondence through Work in Women’s Studies.” In Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, eds., 291-299.
Melville, Herman. (1855) 1981. “Benito Cereno.” In Billy Budd, Sailor and Other Stories by Herman Melville, 131-209. New York: Bantam.
Morrison, Toni. 1989. “Unspeakable Things Unspoken: The Afro-American Presence in American Literature.” Michigan Quarterly Review 28 (1): 1-18.
—. 1992. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. New York: Vintage.
Nadel, Alan. 1988. Invisible Criticism: Ralph Ellison and the American Canon. Iowa City: U of Iowa P.
Nayak K., Kishori. 1994. “Ethnic Relations in Mark Twain and Ralph Ellison: A Comparative Study.” Indian Journal of American Studies 24 (2): 36-44.
Omans, Stuart E. 1975. “The Variations on a Masked Leader: A Study on the Literary Relationship of Ralph Ellison and Herman Melville.” In South Atlantic Bulletin 40 (2): 15-23.
Rogin, Michael Paul. 1985. Subversive Genealogy: The Politics and Art of Herman Melville. Berkeley: U of California P.
Rohrberger, Mary. 1989. “‘Ball the Jack’: Surreality, Sexuality, and the Role of Women in Invisible Man.” In Approaches to Teaching Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man, edited by Susan Resneck and Pancho Savery, 124-132. New York: MLA.
Sale, Maggie Montesinos. 1997. The Slumbering Volcano: American Slave Ship Revolts and the Production of Rebellious Masculinity. London and Durham, NC: Duke UP.
Segal, Lynne, 1997. Slow Motion: Changing Masculinities, Changing Men. London: Virago.
Sundquist, Eric J. 2008. “1855/1955: From Antislavery to Civil Rights.” In Frederick Douglass and Herman Melville: Essays in Relation, edited by Robert S. Levine and Samuel Otter, 416-435. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P.
Sylvander, Carolyn W. 1975. “Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man and Female Stereotypes.” Negro American Literature Forum 9: 77-79.
Van Tassel, Emily Field. 1997. “‘Only the Law Would Rule between Us’: Antimiscegenation, the Moral Economy of Dependency, and the Debate over Rights after the Civil War.” In Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, eds., 152-156.
Walker, Alice. 1983. In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens. New York: Harcourt.
Wallace, Robert K. 2005. Douglass and Melville: Anchored Together in Neighborly Style. New Bedford, MA: Spinner.
Wiegman, Robyn. 1995. American Anatomies: Theorizing Race and Gender. Durham, NC: Duke UP.
Wildman, Stephanie M. and Adrienne Davis. 1997. “Making Systems of Privilege Visible.” In Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, eds., 314-319.
Young, Helen. 2015. Race and Popular Fantasy Literature: Habits of Whiteness. New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
