The Impact of Feedback and Explicit Rhetorical Instruction on EFL Students’ Writing Proficiency in Higher Education
AbstractThe efficacy of feedback on EFL students’ writing proficiency has been researched extensively and has also sparked off considerable controversy among detractors and supporters alike. However, there is still room for further investigation on how feedback can better contribute to students’ writing performance and how it can be fully integrated into the learning process. This article empirically demonstrates the learning advantages of combining both feedback and explicit rhetorical instruction for improving EFL students’ writing skills in the context of higher education. In a longitudinal study of the rhetorical competence of students’ written production carried out over a semester, three treatment variables were investigated: the effect of feedback, the effect of explicit instruction and the combination of both, along with a control condition of no treatment at all. Students were allocated to a treatment group on the basis of their attendance and work profile and the results of the analysis of the written production of each group were compared. The findings confirm not only that the group that received the combined treatment achieved higher grades and displayed a better control of relevant microskills in their written production, but also that neither feedback nor explicit instruction alone proved as effective in terms of rhetorical competence as the combination of the two variables.
Al-Mahooqi, Rahma et al., eds. 2015. Methodologies for Effective Writing Instruction in EFL and ESL Classrooms. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Bitchener, John. 2008. “Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17: 102-18.
Bitchener, John and Dana Ferris. 2012. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. London and New York: Routledge.
De la Paz, Susan and Steve Graham. 2002. “Explicitly Teaching Strategies, Skills and Knowledge: Writing Instruction in Middle School Classrooms.” Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (4): 687-98.
De la Paz, Susan and Cindy K. Sherman. 2013. “Revising Strategy Instruction in Inclusive Settings: Effects for English Learners and Novice Writers.” Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 28 (3): 129-41.
Denman, C. J. 2015. “Explicit Instruction in Western Cultures in the English-Language Writing Classrooms of the Arab Gulf: Pedagogical Perspectives.” In Al-Mahooqi et al. 2015, 1-13.
Díaz Galán, Ana and Mª del Carmen Fumero Pérez. 2003. “The Problem-Solution Pattern: A Tool for the Teaching of Writing?” Barcelona English Language and Literature Studies (BELLS) 12: 1-10.
Downs, Douglas and Elizabeth Wardle. 2007. “Teaching about Writing, Righting Misconceptions: (Re)Envisioning ‘First-Year Composition’ as ‘Introduction to Writing Studies.’” College Composition and Communication 58 (4): 552-84.
Fearn, Leif and Nancy Farnan. “An Investigation of the Influence of Teaching Grammar in Writing to Accomplish an Influence on Writing.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April 2005.
Ferris, Dana R. 1999. “The Case for Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes: A Response to Truscott (1996).” Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 1-11.
—. 2003. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
—. 2010. “Second Language Writing Research and Written Corrective Feedback in SLA: Intersections and Practical Applications.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32 (2): 191-201.
—. 2012. “Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing Studies.” Language Teaching 45 (4): 446-59.
Ferris, Dana R. and Barrie Roberts. 2001. “Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How Explicit Does it Need to Be?” Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161-84.
Gibbs, Graham. 2010. Using Assessment to Support Student Learning. Leeds: Leeds Met Press.
Gibbs, Graham and Claire Simpson. 2004. “Conditions under which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1: 3-31.
Hartshorn, K. James et al. 2010. “Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy.” TESOL Quarterly 44 (1): 84-109.
Hartshorn, K. James and Norman W. Evans. 2015. “The Effects of Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback: A 30-Week Study.” Journal of Response to Writing 1 (2): 6-34.
Hoey, Michael. 2001. Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
Kurzer, Kendon. 2018. “Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback in Developmental Multilingual Writing Classes.” TESOL Quarterly 52 (1): 5-33.
Lantolf, James P. and Steven L. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Lee, Icy. 2014. “Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (1): 201-13.
—. 2016. “Teacher Education on Feedback in EFL Writing: Issues, Challenges and Future Directions.” TESOL Quarterly 50 (2): 518-27.
Midgette, Ekaterina, Priti D. Haria and Charles MacArthur. 2008. “The Effects of Content and Audience Goals for Revision on the Persuasive Essays of Fifth- and Eighth-Grade Students.” Reading and Writing 21 (1-2): 131-51.
Moon, Brian R. 2012. “Remembering Rhetoric: Recalling a Tradition of Explicit Instruction in Writing.” English in Australia 47 (1): 37-52.
Polio, Charlene and Mark C. Shea. 2014. “An Investigation into Current Measures of Linguistic Accuracy in Second Language Writing Research.” Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 10-27.
Price, Margaret et al. 2010. “Feedback: All that Effort, but What Is the Effect? The Effectiveness of our Feedback Practices.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 277-89.
Reimann, Nicola, Ian Sadler and Kay Sambell. “Feedforward in Higher Education: Conceptualisations and Practices.” Paper presented at the Higher Education Conference, Amsterdam, July 2016.
Sutphen, Aminah. 2015. “Investigating Scaffolding Writing Instruction: A Tool for Struggling EFL Writers.” In Al-Mahooqi et al. 2015, 169-96.
Thonney, Teresa. 2011. “Teaching the Conventions of Academic Discourse.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College 38 (4): 347-62.
Truscott, John. 2007. “The Effect of Error Correction on Learners’ Ability to Write Accurately.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16: 255-72.
—. “Some Thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s Critique of the Correction Debate.” System 38 (2): 329-35.
Wilder, Laura. 2012. Rhetorical Strategies and Genre Conventions in Literary Studies: Teaching and Writing in the Disciplines. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.