The Lexical Domains of Ugliness and Aesthetic Horror in the Old English Formulaic Style
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2023-45.1.09Abstract
Even though as of late there has been a renewed interest in the aesthetic ideals in early Medieval England, the conceptualisation and experience of ugliness in Old English sources has been largely neglected. Drawing on the recent research carried out on aesthetic emotions and folk aesthetics, and despite the lack of academic materials on artistic and literary canons of ugliness, the purpose of this paper is to look into the terms that rendered the experience of ugliness and its closest emotional response, aesthetic horror, in order to examine how these are employed in poetic texts. The findings from this study evidence a lack of use of terms for negative aesthetic experience in Old English poetry that suggests that the lexical domain of ugliness and related emotional responses were not fundamental constituents of the Old English formulaic style, while the lexical domain of beauty and its responses were. Additionally, this study highlights the fundamentally moral character of the idea of ugliness.
Downloads
References
Adorno, Theodor. 2002. Aesthetic Theory. London: Continuum.
Anlezark, Daniel. 2011. Old Testament Narratives. Cambridge: Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library.
Bettella, Patricia. 2005. The Ugly Woman: Transgressive Aesthetic Models in Italian Poetry from the Middle Ages to the Baroque. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bjork, Robert E. 2014. Old English Shorter Poems. Volume II: Wisdom and Lyric. Cambridge: Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library.
Bosworth, Joseph and Northcote Toller, comp. 2013a. The Bosworth-Toller AngloSaxon Dictionary Online. Prague: Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague.
—, 2013b. s. v. “Unfæger.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
—, 2013c. s.v. “Wlitelēas.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
—, 2013d. s.v. “For.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
—, 2013e. s.v. “Wearg.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
—, 2013f. s.v. “Scræf.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
Cameron, Angus et al., comp. 1981. Dictionary of Old English Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project 1981.
—, eds. 2018a. Dictionary of Old English: A to I Online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project.
—, 2018b. s. v. “Atol.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
—, 2018c. s.v. “Forniman.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
—, 2018d. s.v. “Forscyppan.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
Clayton, Mary. 2013. Old English Poems of Christ and his Saints. Cambridge: Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library.
Cousins, Mark. 1994. “The Ugly. Part 1.” AA Files 28: 61-64.
Díaz-Vera, Javier E. 2011. “Reconstructing the Old English Cultural Model for Fear.” Atlantis: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 33 (1): 85-103.
—, 2015. “Exploring the Relationships Between Emotions, Language and Space: Construals of Awe in Medieval English Language and Pilgrimage Experience.” Studia Neophilologica 88 (2): 165-82.
Eco, Umberto. 2004. On Beauty: A History of a Western Ideal. London: Harvill Secker.
—, 2007. On Ugliness. London: Harvill Secker.
Fingerhut, Joerg and Jesse Prinz. 2020. “Aesthetic Emotions Reconsidered.” The Monist 103 (2): 223-39.
Fulk, Robert D. 1996. “Rhetoric, Form and Linguistic Structure in Early Germanic Verse: Toward a Synthesis.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 1: 63-88.
Gladkova, Anna and Jesús Romero-Trillo. 2014. “Ain’t it Beautiful? The Conceptualization of Beauty from an Ethnopragmatic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 60: 140-59.
—, eds. 2021. “The Conceptualization of ‘Beautiful’ and ‘Ugly’ across Languages and Cultures.” Special Issue of the International Journal of Language and Culture 8 (1).
Gries, Stephan Th. 2010. “Behavioral Profiles: A Fine-Grained and Quantitative Approach in Corpus-Based Lexical Semantics.” The Mental Lexicon 5(3): 326-46.
Hagman, George. 2005. Aesthetic Experience: Beauty, Creativity, and the Search for the Ideal. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi. B. V.
Harbus, Antonina. 2012. Cognitive Approaches to Old English Poetry. Cambridge: Brewer.
Healey, Antonette dePaolo, comp. 2009. Dictionary of Old English Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project 2009.
Hill, John M., ed. 2010. On the Aesthetics of Beowulf and other Old English Poems. Toronto: U. of Toronto P.
Johnson, Jonathan W. 2019. “The Anatomy of Ugliness: Locating the Experience of Aesthetic Negativity.” PhD diss., Honk Kong Baptist University.
Jorgensen, Alice. 2015. Learning about Emotion from the Old English Prose Psalms of the Paris Psalter. In Jorgensen, McCormack and Wilcox 2015, 127-42.
—, Frances McCormack and Jonathan Wilcox. 2015. Anglo-Saxon Emotions: Reading the Heart in Old English Language, Literature and Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
Juslin, Patrik N. 2013. “From Everyday Emotions to Aesthetic Emotions: Toward a Unified Theory of Musical Emotions.” Physics of Life Reviews 10 (3): 235-66.
Kuplen, Mojca. 2013. “The Sublime, Ugliness and Contemporary Art: A Kantian Perspective.” Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy 1: 114-41.
Lockett, Leslie. 2011. Anglo-Saxon Psychologies in the Vernacular and Latin Tradition. Toronto: U. of Toronto P.
Menninghaus, Winfried et al. 2019. “What are Aesthetic Emotions?” Psychological Review 126 (2): 171-95.
Minaya Gómez, Francisco Javier. 2021a. The Lexical Domain of Beauty and its Metaphors in the Anglo-Saxon Formulaic Style. Berlin: Peter Lang.
—, 2021b. “Emotions of Disgust and Unpleasant Personal Experience as Aesthetic Responses in the Old English Poetic Corpus.” English Studies 103 (2): 179-201.
—, 2022. “Wonder, Beauty, Ability and the Natural World: The Experience of Wonder as a Positive Aesthetic Emotion in Old English Verse.” SELIM 27 (1): 1-27.
Mize, Britt. 2013. Traditional Subjectivities: The Old English Poetics of Mentality. Toronto: U. of Toronto P.
Pop, Andrei and Mechtild Widrich. 2013. The Non-Beautiful in Art and Theory. London: Bloomsbury.
Ramey, Peter. 2017. “The Riddle of Beauty: The Aesthetics of Wrætlic in Old English Verse.” Modern Philology 114 (3): 457-81.
Roberts, Jane, Christian Kay and Lynne Grundy, comp. 2017a. A Thesaurus of Old English. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
—, 2017b. s. v. “Ugliness.” [Accessed online on July 20, 2021].
Rosenkranz, Karl. 2015. Aesthetics of Ugliness: A Critical Edition. London: Bloomsbury.
Scherer, Klaus R. 2005. “What Are Emotions? And How Can They Be Measured?” Social Science Information 44 (4): 695-729.
Varela, Francisco J., Eleanor Rosch and Evan Thompson. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Williamson, Craig. 2017. The Complete Old English Poems. Philadelphia: U. of Pennsylvania P.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
Funding data
-
Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha
Grant numbers SBPLY/17/180501/000267
