Science Fiction Re-Visioned: Posthuman Gothic in Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2023-45.1.07Abstract
In this essay, I analyse two episodes from the recent television series, Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams. I contend that, by adapting Philip K. Dick’s short stories from the 1950s for the screen, the creators of “Impossible Planet” and “The Commuter” offer an important new perspective from which to appreciate the value of his early fiction, which is too often dismissed by critics as juvenilia. Moreover, by re-visioning Dick’s work as posthuman Gothic narratives, the episodes refract long-standing Gothic anxieties about alterity and (post)human existence through a lens that is more often associated with science fiction. This hybridization is instrumental to Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams’ interrogation of the paradigmatic binaries between life/death, interiority/exteriority and reality/virtuality. In my analysis, I use Rosi Braidotti’s theory of posthuman death, as well as Roger Luckhurst’s concept of Weird zones, to illuminate how Electric Dreams explores some of the existential issues that arise from human-technological imbrication.
Downloads
References
Aldiss, Brian. 1986. Trillion Year Spree: The History of Science Fiction. 2nd ed. New York: Atheneum.
Bloom, Clive, ed. 2021. The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Gothic. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Botting, Fred. 2008a. Limits of Horror: Technology, Bodies, Gothic. Manchester: Manchester UP.
—, 2008b. Gothic Romanced: Consumption, Gender and Technology in Contemporary Fiction. New York: Routledge.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
Canavan, Gerry, ed. 2016. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction. Bern: Peter Lang.
Cherry, Brigid, Peter Howell and Caroline Ruddell, eds. 2010. Twenty-First-Century Gothic. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Dick, Philip K. (1968) 2010. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. London: Gollancz.
—, 2017. Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams. London: Gollancz.
Easterbrook, Nick. 1995. “Dianoia/Paranoid: Dick’s Double ‘Imposter’.” In Umland 1995, 19-42.
Edwards, Justin D., ed. 2015. Technologies of the Gothic in Literature and Culture: Technogothics. New York and London: Routledge.
—, 2015. “Introduction: Technogothics.” In Edwards 2015, 1-16.
Farr, David, dir. 2017a. “Impossible Planet.” Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams, season 1, episode 2. UK and USA: Channel 4 and Amazon Studios.
—, 2017b. “Introduction by David Farr.” In Dick 2017, 39-40.
Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge.
Harper, Jack, dir. 2017. “The Commuter.” Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams, season 1, episode 3. UK and USA: Channel 4 and Amazon Studios.
Harrison, John M. 2006. Nova Swing. London: Gollancz.
Hayles, Katherine N. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago and London: U of Chicago P.
Heise-von der Lippe, Anya. 2019. “Posthuman Gothic.” In Webster and Aldana Reyes 2019, 218-30.
Hue and Cry. 1988. “Looking for Linda.” Track 2 on Remote. Circa.
Lucas, George, dir. 1977. Star Wars. USA: Lucasfilm Ltd.
Luckhurst, Roger. 2011. “In the Zone: Typologies of Genre Weirdness.” In Wasson and Alder 2011, 21-35.
—, 2015. “Biomedical Horror: The New Death and the New Undead.” In Edwards 2015, 84-98.
Mellor, Louisa. 2018. “Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams Episode 2 Review: Impossible Planet.” Den of Geek, January 13. [Accessed July 12, 2021].
Millette, Holly-Gale. 2021. “Posthuman Interstellar Gothic.” In Bloom 2021, 1191-208.
Nayar, Pramod K. 2014. Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity.
O’Connell, Mark. 2017. To Be a Machine: Adventures Among Cyborgs, Utopians, Hackers, and the Futurists Solving the Modest Problem of Death. London: Granta.
Reiner, Jeffrey, dir. 2017. “Real Life.” Philip K. Dick’s Electric Dreams, season 1, episode 5. UK and USA: Channel 4 and Amazon Studios.
Rich, Adrienne. 1972. “When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision.” English 34 (1): 18-30.
Robb, Brian J. 2017. “Electric Dreams Episode 2 Impossible Planet.” Counterfeit Worlds, September 26. [Accessed March 9, 2021].
Spooner, Catherine. 2010. “Preface.” In Cherry, Howl and Ruddell 2010, ix-xii.
Stam, Robert. 2005. “Introduction: The Theory and Practice of Adaptation.” In Stam and Raengo 2005, 1-52.
— and Alessandra Raengo, eds. 2005. Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Strugatsky, Arkady and Boris Strugatsky. (1977) 2012. Roadside Picnic. Translated by Olena Bormashenko. Chicago: Chicago Review Press.
Suvin, Darko. 2016. “Estrangement and Cognition.” In Canavan 2016, 15-27.
Umland, Samuel J., ed. 1995. Philip K. Dick: Contemporary Critical Interpretations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Wasson, Sara and Emily Alder, eds. 2011. Gothic Science Fiction 1980-2010. Liverpool: Liverpool UP.
Webster, Maisha and Xavier Aldana Reyes, eds. 2019. Twenty-First-Century Gothic. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
